Monday, April 28, 2025

Latest

Tesla Insurance Faces Lawsuit Alleging Premium Overcharging Based on False Crash Warnings

Tesla Insurance Services Inc. will have to face a prospective class action lawsuit that alleges it overcharged drivers for their insurance premiums based on “false” crash warnings rather than actual driving behavior, as ruled by Judge Brad Seligman of Alameda County Superior Court in California.

The consumer protection lawsuit, filed under California’s unfair competition law, was brought against Tesla’s (NASDAQ: TSLA) insurance unit, which was launched in 2019 with the promise of providing superior service compared to other auto insurers, according to a Reuters special report last month.

While Tesla Insurance has denied misleading consumers, the judge allowed a breach of contract claim by plaintiff Ricky Stephens, an Illinois resident, to be dismissed. However, Stephens has been given the opportunity to amend this claim.

Stephens filed the lawsuit on behalf of Tesla drivers in several states, including Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, Utah, and Virginia.

Tesla’s insurance premiums are said to be determined by a “safety score,” which considers vehicle data, including hard-braking, “aggressive” turning, and “forward collision warning alerts.” However, the lawsuit alleges that many Tesla drivers have experienced false Forward Collision Warnings, leading to lower safety scores and higher premiums.

Stephens’ complaint seeks restitution, disgorgement of profits, and an injunction against alleged false advertising by Tesla. His lawyer stated that an injunction would require Tesla to ensure the accuracy of its advertising and prevent it from factoring in driving events that never occurred.

An initial hearing is scheduled for January. Tesla and its insurance subsidiary have not yet provided a response or comment regarding the ruling.

Via Threads

Information for this story was found via Reuters, Electrek, and the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Leave a Reply

Video Articles

Bell Q3 Earnings: Massive Impairments. Guidance Cuts. A Mess.

Alamos Gold Q3: Record Revenue & Production Amid Rising Costs

The Junior Mining Market Is Back

Recommended

Germany Looks To Modernize Military Recruitment But Stops Short of Conscription

First Majestic Silver Posts Topline Revenue Of $146.1 Million In Q3 2024

Related News

Tesla Amends Lithium Deal With Piedmont Lithium

Piedmont Lithium (Nasdaq: PLL) stated on Tuesday that it has revised its deal with Tesla...

Thursday, January 5, 2023, 06:21:00 AM

Elon Musk Defends His $50 Billion Tesla Pay Package

Many have said it before: Elon Musk has a lot, maybe too much, on his...

Thursday, November 17, 2022, 09:42:40 AM

Morgan Stanley: Apple’s EV Market Entrance Puts Tesla in Bearish Territory

Shortly after Elon Musk frantically turned to Twitter to reveal to the world that Apple...

Monday, December 28, 2020, 03:56:00 PM

Tesla Backs Off Controversial Cybertruck ‘No Resale’ Policy

Tesla has quietly removed language from its sales agreement outlining the “no resale” policy for...

Wednesday, November 15, 2023, 02:07:00 PM

Morgan Stanley: Tesla Rapidly Losing Market Share to Ford’s Mustang Mach-E

It appears that Elon Musk may soon be forced to roll up his sleeves and...

Thursday, March 4, 2021, 03:57:00 PM