Stanford Student Finds That Academics Are Abusing ChatGPT

Software developer and student at Stanford University Andrew Gao has spotted something peculiar about recently published studies online: many of them forgot to acknowledge a co-author, OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

Gao, who specializes in artificial intelligence and large language models, took to X, the platform everyone prefers to still call Twitter, to talk about what he found after doing a search for the phrase “As an AI language model” on Google Scholar.

The phrase is how the large language model ChatGPT begins its responses as a blanket disclaimer whenever it’s asked to take on the role of a human – like when prompted to have an opinion on something subjective about something, discuss a theory, or whenever it’s prompted to generate restricted content.

Mercado Minerals — sponsored Sponsored · Mercado Minerals

While the phrase has proliferated a good portion of the web, the results that Gao pulled up from Google Scholar — the search engine for scholarly/academic content — was astounding. There were papers upon papers, peer-reviewed journals, book analyses, and more

One would think academics, of all people, would be careful enough to check the output and not have to copy-paste the entire ChatGPT response, including the now-ubiquitous disclaimer phrase. 

According to Gao, and many would agree, using ChatGPT isn’t exactly wrong as it can be useful, but — it needs to be properly acknowledged. This also highlights the fact that AI-generated content is not yet completely reliable as large language models have the tendency to make things up, or “hallucinate.”

In June, a New York judge fined lawyers for using ChatGPT to create a legal brief. Attorneys Peter LoDuca and Steven Schwartz, and their law firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman were slapped with a $5,000 sanction. They AI-generated document, which was was supposed to be for an otherwise unremarkable torte case, contained made up cases and citations.

Gao’s findings, while funny at first, also brings to light that people will take what ChatGPT gives them as is, without even giving it a once-over to make sure no glaring phrases like “as an AI language model” make it to their final work.  


Information for this story was found via the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Silver Is in a New Price Regime, and the Market Isn’t Used to It | Keith Neumeyer – First Majestic

Agnico Eagle Just Made a Massive Gold Land Grab

A Copper-Gold Deposit Caught the White House’s Attention | Rob McLeod – Cambria Gold

Recommended

Mercado Drills 256 g/t Silver Over 6.5 Metres In First Drill Hole of Inaugural Program

Antimony Resources Drills 4.38% Sb Over 7.05 Metres At Bald Hill In Final Hole Of 2025 Program

Trending

Related News

Microsoft Partners with OpenAI for ChatGPT-Powered Version of Bing

Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ: MSFT) is stepping up to challenge Alphabet’s (NASDAQ: GOOGL) Google. The company...

Wednesday, January 4, 2023, 07:20:00 AM

OpenAI Nears Record Valuation of Up to $90 Billion with Possible Share Sale

OpenAI, the artificial intelligence startup responsible for ChatGPT, is currently in discussions with potential investors...

Wednesday, September 27, 2023, 01:42:00 PM

OpenAI’s ChatGPT Passes Medical Licensure, Wharton MBA Exams

If ChatGPT were a real person, they would have been a medical doctor with a...

Monday, January 23, 2023, 12:26:00 PM

OpenAI Closes Record $122 Billion Funding Round at $852 Billion Valuation

OpenAI closed the largest private funding round in Silicon Valley’s history Tuesday, raising $122 billion...

Sunday, April 12, 2026, 11:15:00 AM

OpenAI Secures Record $6.6 Billion Funding, Seeks Investor Exclusivity

OpenAI has raised $6.6 billion in a groundbreaking funding round that values the company at...

Thursday, October 3, 2024, 09:39:00 AM